Monday, July 31, 2006

Mad Cow

I'm convinced that it is getting harder and harder to tell stories in The Onion from real stories. The US has long maintained that there is no Mad Cow disease in the US. Critics had argued that the level of testing was far too low to actually detect it if it was present. Eventually the Agriculture department increased the testing rate - and lo and behold they discovered infected cows (you probably read about this in the press because other countries now banned US beef).

In the news just a few days ago was an announcement from the agriculture department that they would scale back testing for BSE (the technical name for mad cow disease) by 90%. NINETY PERCENT! I'm no expert but I'm guessing that they won't find as many of those pesky infected animals that cause export bans.

If you think this is bad then check this out. Individual farmers or companies who want to carry our further testing on their own animals at their own expense are prohibited from doing so by the Agriculture department because 'it could make consumers think that untested beef was not safe.'

As usual if you don't know much about Mad Cow disease, BSE, CJD etc then Wikipedia is a better place to start than a google search.

Labels:

1 Comments:

At 2:44 PM, Blogger Caribou said...

I agree with you 100%.

Due to pressure from the U.S. government we have not adopted a system that tests every animal like Japan and some other countries. The U.S. government, under pressure from the large meat processors are concerned that if we go to a total testing program, the American public will abandon locally grown meat for Canadian meat.

Just for the record, the feed that cause BSE in the Canadian cow that was discovered in the U.S. came from a feed processor in Oregon which was using blood, brains, spinal tissue, and offal from cattle while the rest of the world had banned it. It was banned in Canada, but only for feed processed in Canada. The importation is now also banned.

Our government, like yours needs to wake up and protect the consumer, and not large agribusines.

Cheers
rb

 

Post a Comment

<< Home