Midterm 3 results

I was e-mailed the mean and the results for each answer for the final midterm but not the histogram. I will get mailed a copy of that but I thought some of you might want to see the rest of the information right away.

The mean was 82% (vs. 81% last year)

I have looked at the answer distribution for all the questions to check for problems and everything looks fine.

Lowest % correct was 57% for Q12 (self-thinning question) and 58% for Q 27 (cutting a shoot question).

Highest % correct was 98% (one question: the fresh fruit question - I'm glad this course has some practical uses!).
I have looked closely at all the questions where either less than two thirds of you got the correct answer (three questions) or more than 20% of you picked a particular incorrect answer (four questions) and don't see any problems.

This time last year: Midterm 3 etc

Sayōnara

As I may, or may not, have mentioned at the beginning of the class this was my last Berkeley class. After 10 years here, 11 Bio1B summer sessions, 14 semesters of es196, 3 semesters of IB100, 1 semester of ES10, 1 semester of ES100, four freshmen seminars and numerous other guest lectures and things I'm forgetting it is time to move on. UC Berkeley, at least in certain science departments, has a policy of having research faculty teach all classes and not employing teaching faculty except on short term contracts. That's fine, it's their university and they can make the rules. However UC Santa Barbara have offered me a tenured teaching faculty position. I will be able to develop the classes I want, have some security of employment and contribute to course and curriculum development. I'll miss Berkeley and its students but I look forward to the challenges ahead.

Purple Earth

A fun post to finish with, although if I get an electronic copy of the grade distribution I will post that. I am leaving the University tomorrow so thanks for making my last course enjoyable.

One thing I enjoy about teaching basic biology is finding out how much we don't know and constantly finding fun new hypotheses. Here's one I briefly mentioned today that relates to why plants are green and what life might look like on other planets.

You can find a brief description of the purple planet hypothesis here, the implications of this, and other research, for what life on other planets might be like is discussed here.

This time last year: We beat Turkey!

Dr Fungus

I know that there are probably more than a few of you who are, or intend to be, pre-med. For your interest and edification I direct you to Dr Fungus - an independent Web site dedicated to providing a wide range of scholarly peer-reviewed contemporary and historical information regarding fungi.

'We seek to promote an understanding of fungi and the ways that fungal diseases of humans, animals, and plants affect people living throughout the world. We provide information to both professionals and the public by making a broad range of mycology-related images and content instantly available via the World Wide Web.'

You can attempt a diagnosis of your fungal infection, read about sick building syndrome, learn about anti-fungal agents and check out their image library.

This time last year: Humongous Fungus
Also check out Campbell 7th, and As requested which are still relevant and, hopefully useful.

You say tomato

A report published just a few weeks ago revealed the results of a decade-long study evaluating organic versus conventionally grown tomatoes. The study showed that organic tomatoes increased in their concentration of three flavonoids studied over time whereas the levels of flavonoids did not vary significantly through time in conventional tomatoes. Mean values for quercetin and kaempferol in organic tomatoes were 79% and 97% higher than those in conventional tomatoes, respectively.

'Flavonoids are a class of bioactive plant compounds that help protect plants from UV-radiation, chemicals and other environmental stressors. In humans, flavonoids help protect cells against environmental insults that may contribute to chronic disease. Several population-based studies suggest that diets rich in flavonoids may help protect against cardiovascular disease, certain cancers and other age-related conditions, such as dementia. Maximizing the flavonoid content of fruits and vegetables could provide a public health benefit.'

The mechanism involved is suspected to be related to the availability of soil nitrogen. Plants with limited nitrogen accumulate more flavonoids than those that are well-supplied.

You can read a press report on the story or read the research report itself: Ten-Year Comparison of the Influence of Organic and Conventional Crop Management Practices on the Content of Flavonoids in Tomatoes

This time last year: Only you can prevent forests

Ferrets bounce back

I have to disclose before this post that I'm a huge ferret fan. As you probably know it is illegal to keep ferrets as pets in California. I just checked and Hawaii is the only other state to ban ferrets but several cities also ban them, and Rhode Island will make you buy a 'Ferret permit'. Thanks to Wikipedia I now know that Delta airlines are the only airline to allow ferrets in the cabin during a flight. As I said, I'm a ferret fan but even to me that seems like an accident waiting to happen....

Anyway, the reason for this ferret post is the news this week that the often criticized endangered species act may actually have scored a hit with North America's most endangered mammal, the black footed ferret. This news has numerous links to our ecology lectures, from the way that scientists are estimating the ferret population, to the conservation of endangered species, and the genetic consequences of passing through such a genetic bottleneck.

You can read reports on the research at the LA Times, National Geographic, and many others or read the actual report in the journal Science.

This time last year: Life in a seed

Evolution's greatest mistakes

There's an interesting article in New Scientist magazine this week on Evolution's greatest mistakes. The article covers seven areas of human biology where evolution has made the best of a bad job, and where it would be hard to argue that any 'intelligent' design has been going on. Unfortunately reading the article requires a subscription to the magazine so from a Berkeley website you may, or may not, be able to read it here. But if not, in the interest of academic debate and in the spirit of fair use, I copy an extract below.

A particularly interesting topic for this class is the discussion of mitochondrial DNA. Bottom line: If you wanted to build humans to last, mitochondria are the last place you'd put DNA.

'Inside every one of our cells are dozens of little sacs called mitochondria, in which sugars are "burned" to produce the energy that powers the cells. The process also produces highly damaging molecules called free radicals, so the interior of a mitochondrion is hardly the safest place for vital DNA - and yet it is home to the genes for 13 crucial mitochondrial proteins.

It's a crazy design: like keeping the repair manual for a steam engine by the furnace, where it inevitably becomes charred and unreadable. The slow loss of function as mutations accumulate in mitochondrial DNA may be the main cause of ageing and, some believe, of many age-related diseases, from diabetes to Alzheimer's.

The DNA is there because of our evolutionary history. Mitochondria are the remnants of a once independent bacterium that formed a symbiotic alliance with our cells around 2 billion years ago. Over time, many of the bacterium's original genes have been lost or jumped to the cell nucleus, but human mitochondria still retain 13 genes.

Anti-ageing research is already exploring ways of moving the remaining genes to the safety of the nucleus. It will not be easy. The 13 genes cannot simply be moved to the nuclear genome, because then the 13 proteins will be made outside the mitochondria where they are needed. A solution might be to get the mRNA recipes for proteins delivered to the mitochondria, so the genes reside in the nucleus but the proteins are still made inside the mitochondria.'

This time last year: the very depressing Eastern Garbage Patch

Science Friday

The 'internets' get a lot of grief sometimes and so I feel it is my duty to stick up for them whenever possible. Bless those little tubes.

The reason this struck me today was that I was in my car this morning when Science Friday came on NPR. There were two interesting stories of direct relevance to this class but I had other (out of the car) things to do. Thanks to the wonders of the Internet I was able to download the two segments later and listen to them at my leisure.

The first segment (link to mp3 file) concerns the evolution of man. Researchers working in Kenya have found fossils indicating that Homo habilis did not give rise to Homo erectus, as previously thought, but the two existed at the same time, with Homo erectus and Homo habilis both evolving from a common ancestor 2 to 3 million years ago. The paper is to be published in the journal Nature this week.

The second segment (link to mp3 file) described how researchers have been able to extract frozen bacteria up to eight million years old from Antarctic ice samples. They were able to revive the bacteria and the bacterial colonies began to grow again. This research is published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

This time last year: GM plant escapes into wild